{"id":992,"date":"2019-04-10T12:50:02","date_gmt":"2019-04-10T12:50:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myvotemyindia.in\/news\/?p=992"},"modified":"2019-04-10T12:50:02","modified_gmt":"2019-04-10T12:50:02","slug":"the-supreme-court-rejected-centres-arguments-onclassified-documentsaccessed-by-the-media-on-the-rafale-fighter-jet-deal-cant-be-evidence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myvotemyindia.in\/news\/the-supreme-court-rejected-centres-arguments-onclassified-documentsaccessed-by-the-media-on-the-rafale-fighter-jet-deal-cant-be-evidence\/","title":{"rendered":"The Supreme Court rejected centre&#8217;s arguments on&#8221;Classified Documents&#8221;accessed by the media on the Rafale fighter jet deal can&#8217;t be evidence !"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today flat-out rejected the centre&#8217;s argument that classified documents accessed by the media on the Rafale fighter jet deal can&#8217;t be evidence. The court said it will examine the secret documents while considering petitions asking for a review of its order giving the government a clean chit on the deal that the opposition alleges was corrupt.<\/p>\n<p>The judges today unanimously dismissed the centre&#8217;s objections to considering documents leaked from the defence ministry as evidence and said they would go ahead with the hearing of review petitions, which would be decided on merit.<\/p>\n<p>This means classified documents sourced by the media without authorisation can be considered by the court. It is a huge win for free press at a time questions have been raised over strong-arm tactics to suppress the media.<\/p>\n<p>Mainly citing internal notes of the defence ministry, a series of reports published by The Hindu said the ministry had objected to &#8220;parallel negotiations&#8221; for the jets by the Prime Minister&#8217;s Office.<\/p>\n<p>Pointing to the documents, petitioners had called for a review of the verdict. &#8220;These are sensitive documents relating to defence, but that was precisely what we said too &#8211; that because they are documents of importance, they must be treated as part of supporting documents,&#8221; mainly said former union minister Arun Shourie, one of the petitioners.<\/p>\n<p>The centre had told the court that the documents filed by the petitioners are &#8220;sensitive to national security&#8221;, those who conspired in photocopying the papers have committed theft and put national security in jeopardy by leaking them to the public.<\/p>\n<p>Dismissing the argument, the court said it would fix a date to hear the petitions.<\/p>\n<p>Petitioner Prashant Bhushan had argued that &#8220;if a document is relevant in deciding a fact, how it was obtained becomes irrelevant&#8221;. Mainly citing the US verdict on Pentagon papers leak, he said once documents are published, the government can no longer claim privilege.<\/p>\n<p>N Ram, chairman of The Hindu Publishing Group, said that the documents were published in public interest, and the media group will fiercely protect its sources.<\/p>\n<p>In December, the top court had dismissed petitions alleging that the government had gone for an overpriced deal for 36 Rafale fighter jets to help Anil Ambani&#8217;s rookie defence firm bag an offset contract with jet-maker Dassault Aviation. There was no reason to doubt the decision-making process of the government, the court had said.<\/p>\n<p>The Hindu newspaper published reports which said the deal became more expensive for India because of France&#8217;s refusal to provide bank guarantees.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today flat-out rejected the centre&#8217;s argument that classified documents accessed by the media on the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":993,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[178,35,561],"result":[],"election_2018":[],"class_list":["post-992","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-rafale-issue","tag-arun-shourie","tag-rafale-deal","tag-the-supreme-court"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myvotemyindia.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/992","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myvotemyindia.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myvotemyindia.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myvotemyindia.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myvotemyindia.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=992"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.myvotemyindia.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/992\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myvotemyindia.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/993"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myvotemyindia.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=992"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myvotemyindia.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=992"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myvotemyindia.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=992"},{"taxonomy":"result","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myvotemyindia.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/result?post=992"},{"taxonomy":"election_2018","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myvotemyindia.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/election_2018?post=992"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}